A practical pattern atlas

Listen to an AI overview and inspect a claim

Use explanatory audio while retaining access to the source material and control of the session.

Design proposal · User validation required
Entry

A person chooses a passage and supporting sources for an overview.

Proposed flow

  1. Review scope

    Name verified Scripture, source authors and interpretive perspective; choose length and language.

  2. Generate

    Show progress, cancellation and a repair route without pretending audio is ready.

  3. Listen

    Label synthetic voices and preserve controls, transcript and source list.

  4. Inspect or ask

    Pause to inspect a claim or deliberately enter a question branch with the same source scope.

  5. Return or finish

    Resume at the retained position, save a named version or finish without autoplay.

Recovery and alternative routes

Generation failure retains the source selection. Missing evidence is disclosed; timecodes require reliable alignment. Source changes create a new artifact version. Download and sharing respect source and edition rights.

What counts as a complete outcome

The listener can tell interpretation from quotation and return to the original source.

Decisions within this flow

77 · Audio and guided practice

Generated audio remains connected to its sources

An AI overview explains source material; it remains distinct from a recording of Scripture.

Research-informed design proposal
78 · Study and annotations

Citations open the evidence behind a claim

A citation is a route to supporting material, with source type and limitations visible.

Research-informed design proposal
17 · Audio and guided practice

The player works without the screen

Support listening as a complete mode of use.

Research-informed design proposal
21 · Audio and guided practice

Narration style has provenance

Distinguish an audio edition from an adaptation or generated retelling.

Research-informed design proposal
47 · AI agency and care

Visible work and recoverable failure

Describe real progress, responsibilities and outcomes.

Research-informed design proposal
26 · Conversation and content

Listen, ask permission and repair

Make correction and refusal normal parts of a conversation.

Research-informed design proposal
01 · Reading and Scripture

Scripture and interpretation stay distinct

Make original text, editorial material and generated explanation recognisable.

Research-informed design proposal
79 · AI agency and care

Identify what AI did, where it matters

Label the actor, action and artifact at the moment they could be misunderstood.

Research-informed design proposal
80 · Conversation and content

AI origin travels with saved and shared content

Preserve meaningful attribution when an artifact leaves its original screen.

Research-informed design proposal

Engagement facets to specify

Possible situations: Learning and memorisation, Teaching and preaching preparation. These are overlapping task contexts, not fixed user categories.

Specify the chosen purpose, passage unit, pace, participation, social setting, interpretive task, environment and disclosure or teaching responsibility. Use the scenario framework.