A practical pattern atlas

Prepare teaching with accountable evidence

Build an explanation that another person can inspect, without outsourcing interpretive responsibility.

Design proposal · User validation required
Entry

A teacher chooses a passage, intended audience and question.

Proposed flow

  1. Read in context

    Read the coherent passage and wider book context before extracting a claim.

  2. Compare

    Inspect editions, reliable lexical alignment and attributed perspectives.

  3. Collect evidence

    Attach quotations, excerpts and media anchors to specific draft claims.

  4. Review the draft

    Separate verified Scripture, source interpretation, AI suggestions and the teacher’s own conclusions.

  5. Export deliberately

    Check quotation rights, references and audience; retain human ownership and a versioned source trail.

Recovery and alternative routes

An unavailable source or conflicting interpretation is shown explicitly. AI can assist a draft but cannot approve teaching or manufacture references. Private pastoral material is excluded unless deliberately authorised for this purpose.

What counts as a complete outcome

The teacher can substantiate the explanation and identify unresolved questions.

Decisions within this flow

76 · Reading and Scripture

A bounded passage with a route to wider context

Choose the reading unit by the task while keeping its boundaries and context visible.

Research-informed design proposal
78 · Study and annotations

Citations open the evidence behind a claim

A citation is a route to supporting material, with source type and limitations visible.

Research-informed design proposal
07 · Study and annotations

Compare without flattening

Show differences while keeping edition and reference identity intact.

Research-informed design proposal
31 · Study and annotations

Word study names its basis

Keep lexical data, translation wording and contextual interpretation separate.

Research-informed design proposal
08 · Study and annotations

Original media before synthesis

Let readers inspect the source behind an explanation.

Research-informed design proposal
01 · Reading and Scripture

Scripture and interpretation stay distinct

Make original text, editorial material and generated explanation recognisable.

Research-informed design proposal
16 · Conversation and content

Conversation can produce a reading artifact

Move sustained work into an editable document without losing its origin.

Research-informed design proposal
29 · AI agency and care

Suggest, confirm and act

Separate a generated proposal from a real change.

Research-informed design proposal
79 · AI agency and care

Identify what AI did, where it matters

Label the actor, action and artifact at the moment they could be misunderstood.

Research-informed design proposal
80 · Conversation and content

AI origin travels with saved and shared content

Preserve meaningful attribution when an artifact leaves its original screen.

Research-informed design proposal

Engagement facets to specify

Possible situations: Teaching and preaching preparation, Theological and exegetical study. These are overlapping task contexts, not fixed user categories.

Specify the chosen purpose, passage unit, pace, participation, social setting, interpretive task, environment and disclosure or teaching responsibility. Use the scenario framework.